Quote:
Originally Posted by Cormac  But not all tables are bad. When the information far outweighs design then tabular tables are green for go. |
Well yeah, tables for tabular data is a given of course. But for general laying they're a no-no. Having said that, HTML 4.01 is still a standard so it's hard to know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cormac Don't well coded CSS sites have a semantic advantage over standard table based sites anyway? |
Yes, but from what I can gather it's not really that weighted. Nested headings and such are good for your ranking but semantic code doesn't seem too high on G's list of priorities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cormac Google would have to implement standards on their own sites if they were to make it a factor in SERP ranking. I can't see it happening but certainly in the next few months we are going to see a good few tweaks of G's algorithm. |
There seem to be a few ongoing tweaks anyway. My bloody ranking is going up and down like a yoyo. One minute I'm ranked 21st, the next I'm down to 80th and then back up again... and then down again. It's a nonsense really.
