oo interesting thread.

i didn't realise the spec was for a static site of 20-30 pages. what a nightmare to produce and update. eek. i would charge more, in fact, for a static site than a CMS built site. i want the client to be in charge of the content.

ew... just thinking of all the back and forths from the days of static HTML. ('oh and on this page, we decided to go with Y image instead of X, and change to wording of our mission statement, oh and the price of B product has changed) yikes!

you can keep your maintenance contract, i want to move along to the next project, and let the client handle the content.