This is a discussion on Crippled version of Google? within the Google forums, part of the Search Engine Optimisation category; A client called me today and asked why his site wasn’t appearing in Google. I had created his humble site ...
| |||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| A client called me today and asked why his site wasn’t appearing in Google. I had created his humble site www.nbtrans.ie a few months earlier. So I opened google.ie and searched for noel brennan transport with the ‘pages from Ireland’ option selected. Lo and behold, there he was, first up. That was news to him. So I searched with ‘the web’ as the option and there he was again, first on the list. Thinking later, I remembered him using the google search on Eircom.net when he was showing me competitor websites. So I wondered could the result be different in an ‘enhanced by google’ search on Eircom.net. He didn’t appear, not anywhere. So I did a bit more digging and started to notice other differences. Naturally I double-checked. I even tried resetting my google preferences. Different results, not just search-result order, but number of results found. Take a look at the table here, see what I mean. Digging further, I tried the same searches on iol.ie. Same results as eircom. Could the Irish ISPs bet getting a limited search? So I tried for my friend Noel on tiscali.co.uk. No sign of him, but similar results as Eircom and IOL. The consistent difference between the ‘native’ google search and the Eircom/IOL version of google was the number of results. The ‘native’ google always had more results found. Which leads me to the question – is there a crippled (limited) version of google search for search partners? |
| ||||
| I know they use an API to get the search result. But why would it be in Google's interest to have partners (including AOL) to have a poorer and less relevant search experience? It has been suggested elsewhere that it's a result of Google's supplemental index? Last edited by Conor O'Nolan; 12-12-2007 at 10:22 AM. |
| |||||
| Eircom have routed their traffic through Germany before. Maybe this has a knock on affect on the search.. |
| ||||
| Doubt it's that. Same result when using AOL.com. Interesting that this thread now shows up in both main google and eircom/iol but my clients site still doesn't show on the partner sites. Seems to reinforce the supplemental index theory. |
| ||||
| That site would seem to fit the supplemental profile, though if G was filtering out supplemental pages to its partner searches it could hardly be described as "crippled".... |
| ||||
| Is it not showing result using aol.com...???But one thing is was wondering why would be Google's interest to have partnersto have a poorer and less relevant search experience? Its really shocking...
__________________ Looking for link building? Take a look at BlognList link building . |
| Tags |
| crippled, google, version |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Successful Site in 12 Months with Google Alone | montyauto | Webmaster Articles | 11 | 18-02-2008 01:28 PM |
| How to Avoid the Google Sandbox | Cormac | Webmaster Articles | 26 | 18-02-2008 05:38 AM |
| Google's 9th Birthday - Happy Birthday Google. Have a nice day | megrisoft | 3 | 03-10-2007 05:09 AM | |
| Are Google stupid or is it just me? | Cormac | Webmaster Discussion | 4 | 11-05-2007 04:10 PM |
| Google Question on Regional Google & othes? | Gman290 | Search Engine Optimisation | 8 | 10-05-2007 12:13 PM |
| ||||||||
| | ![]() | |||||||