It all depends what the function of the website is in the first place. If it is used as an advertising medium to bring in new business then
SEO is very important. If the website is an online app for existing clients it wouldnt be as important.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glengara "I think SEO as a stand-alone service is bull****"
That seems to be the kernel of Eoghans' "argument", a favourite one of Kens' and driven mostly by the understandable resentment that the tail now appears to wag the dog. |
Depends on the point of view you look at. If I was an end user who wanted to generate business from my site, I'd much rather a site that mightn't look good, is not code compliant but does convert/generate leads rather than the slickest design, nicest code but never getting eyeballs. I agree with the sentiment that its better to have all three (Design, compliant code,
SEO) but which takes more or should take more priority is always driven by the client. Since the majority of our clients are business it comes back to ROI/sales and in that case its
SEO that comes out on top. Also just from personal experience some of my clients actually enjoy the competition factor of
SEO, i.e. there site ranks higher for their industries key term than their top competitor. It gives them a verifiable answer, i.e. put the search in google , see who's the winner. For the lay person, its very hard to judge which is the better website design from a coding point of view (no coding experience) or from a design point of view (it's personal taste).
Also
SEO as a stand alone service is in demand, take for example Red Cardinal, he's considered a valuable member of the community and he offers this as a standalone service.
SEO is the new buzz and with all change it's better to embrace it and adapt than fighting it.