Feck web accessibilty

Advert test
Status
Not open for further replies.
#21
The simple fact is that your motivations aren't clear. There was zero disclosure in your post to indicate that you were one of the 15 parties mentioned thus implying a underhand and dishonest tactic. (in my opinion of course)

I did go back and alter the post to reflect the sites that did pass, but you neglected to check that before your morning assasination attempt.
That doesn't sway my opinion one bit.
 
#22
The post is poorly written, ill-informed and your subject matter isn't researched beyond a very remedial level. Just because your site passes automated accessibility and validation tests, this doesn't necessarily make you a good designer or an authority of any kind. There seems to be a ridiculous perception that writing valid, accessible XHTML somehow means you're some kind of professional. It doesn't. A donkey with a keyboard could learn HTML.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top