[deleted]
P ph3n0m New Member Jun 15, 2007 #4 Picking up from this blog - how royally screwed would you be if the "glitch" was permanent?
mneylon Administrator Staff member Jun 15, 2007 #5 ph3n0m said: Picking up from this blog - how royally screwed would you be if the "glitch" was permanent? Click to expand... Huh? You mean his fugly css? /me thanks God for RSS readers
ph3n0m said: Picking up from this blog - how royally screwed would you be if the "glitch" was permanent? Click to expand... Huh? You mean his fugly css? /me thanks God for RSS readers
P ph3n0m New Member Jun 15, 2007 #6 Nope, I am talking about the "glitch" in google that cause the OP's initial loss. How royally screwed would a user be if the "glitch" was permanent? Are people to heavily reliant on google?
Nope, I am talking about the "glitch" in google that cause the OP's initial loss. How royally screwed would a user be if the "glitch" was permanent? Are people to heavily reliant on google?
R rsynnott New Member Jun 16, 2007 #7 blacknight said: Huh? You mean his fugly css? /me thanks God for RSS readers Click to expand... I am hoping that it's simply that his webpage doesn't work on Safari properly. It's SHOCKINGLY ugly on Safari.
blacknight said: Huh? You mean his fugly css? /me thanks God for RSS readers Click to expand... I am hoping that it's simply that his webpage doesn't work on Safari properly. It's SHOCKINGLY ugly on Safari.
mneylon Administrator Staff member Jun 16, 2007 #8 rsynnott said: I am hoping that it's simply that his webpage doesn't work on Safari properly. It's SHOCKINGLY ugly on Safari. Click to expand... It's the same in Firefox
rsynnott said: I am hoping that it's simply that his webpage doesn't work on Safari properly. It's SHOCKINGLY ugly on Safari. Click to expand... It's the same in Firefox
