I hear ya Kieran ... I've had this conversation so many times.
The worst part is that I've heard it from people who've engaged web designers with a lot of experience. My theory is thus - there a lot of people who are capable of putting together a website - and they fall into the following categories:
- Graphic designers - who tend to rely on their Graphic Design capability to create aesthetically pleasing sites. To a lot of people, particularly brand focused, this is crucial and good designers can command good fees and get a lot of referral work. They are possibly least technically interested or SEO-aware (blanket statement I know, no offence, there are obviously those good at everything)
- Web designer/developer group - more interested in functionality, may team up or employ good designer types
- IT People who can build a web page - are familiar with web components such as .net, HTML or dreamweaver.
- Give-it-a-go-hero's who will struggle away on Wordpress, HTML, dreamweaver, notepad, whatever it takes - and they can produce anything from anywhere in the spectrum of good to bad - including self-build or even "professional as a service" model
- Brand-type marketeer/agency types - usually 4 - 25 people, using strong design, some development components, huge focus on brand, AdWords experts, some SEO - all-in-one "web marketing house
The problem is that very few people have actually had a successful web business --- so how can they share experiences or advice?
I think web owners have to realise that the web is the future - its not easier. There is no €100 fix. You can't order an online business like you do a pizza. Just because you can file a VAT return or create your own logo and letter headed paper doesn't mean you can run a business. The web is just a new branch which you have to engage with. I know many web people who two years ago didn't understand the web and have to engage with many different web people until they learnt themselves.
The same has been my experience with accountants and solicitors. You'd think that they would all be good given the training they've had and the high pedestal they are placed within society (albeit larely by themselves) - but I've come to realise that most of them are just technical and charge a lot for the sake of it. I haven't ever met a solicitor who could just understand my case - in many times I've felt I can understand things better than they can - sure, they know the technical parts of the law but they're rarely creative or innovative and I've found that largely dissappointing.
In summary, if people aren't willing to engage the people they employ as consultants, then leave them off - they'll learn.